The Consultative Broker™ Briefing
Volume VII, Number 11
A Free Publication of
C.R. Ekern & Company
888.670.1177
www.crekern.com
Copyright, C. R. Ekern & Company, 2007
Brokerage
Darwinism Part One - The Richard Nixon Process
Picture this scenario… You have just come from meeting your top prospect. They have informed you that because they like you so much, you will be
given first chance of selecting the 3
carriers you need to bid their insurance. You, of course, will be competing
against several other agents. As a Consultative Broker, you know that this will
not be in their best interests. What
do you tell this client in order to demonstrate this?
You
could say . . . “Unfortunately, there are not that many carriers
that will do the right job for you. By
fragmenting the marketplace, you are doing yourself a disservice.”
Or,
you could say. . . “By placing multiple brokers and carriers in
the marketplace, you are in fact driving your own prices up through
diminishing reinsurance capacity.”
You
might even say . . . “When you put brokers into the marketplace
on a bid basis, you are allowing the carrier to select the broker.”
All of these are valid
points, but miss the real picture. Here
is the real BIG answer as to why a prospect
should not use the marketplace selection process… It is antiquated! It does not take into account what I call “Brokerage Darwinism”.
But first, a little
history lesson. The Marketplace
Selection process was first used in the mid to late 70’s. I know because I was actually there! At the time there were 35,000 Independent Insurance agencies across the
country. Frankly, they all looked
the same to buyers. There was no
difference between them, except in one area. The carriers they represented.
The quality of an agency
was determined by some of the carrier plaques that hung on the walls. We differentiated ourselves by pointing to the quality insurance carriers
we represented. Companies like The
Continental, The Home, The Aetna (big and little), The Kemper, The USF&G,
The Royal, and of course The Reliance. (I’ve still got the trinkets from all of them.)
So, over time, the top
agencies used their unique ability to access carriers as the main point of their
value proposition. After all, from
that point forward, most competing agencies looked the same. We all paid claims
and serviced policies.
In an effort to control a
process that in many cases might involve up to 30 competing carriers, the
Marketplace Selection process was born. It
allowed a buyer to bring some sense into a process that had become out of
control. By assigning markets, the
buyer could at least keep the quagmire of a playing field level by knowing who
was going where. In most cases you
needed a scorecard.
Now, flash forward some 30
years. The majority of the major national carriers that existed when
the process was developed are no longer around, or have merged. The marketplace doesn’t offer 25 or more legitimate alternatives. What’s more, the major carriers that do still exist; have contracts
with virtually all the top agencies. The carrier contracts are no longer a point of
differentiation.
So here is the bottom
line. When you, as a broker, allow
a buyer to back you into the Marketplace Selection process (bid and quote) they
are forcing you back in time. They
are making you operate like it is 1974. Can
you say Richard Nixon? Has your
business evolved since then? Has
their business operations changed? Chances
are that if you forced them to operate their business with 1974 methods, tools,
and techniques they would be out of business. What does that say about those of us that are willing to operate our
business like it is still 1974?
In Part 2, we will give
you the ammunition needed to dissolve a buyer’s confidence in the Richard
Nixon Process. If you keep reading
. . . we will keep writing. Let us
know what you think.
Best regards to all Consultative Brokers,
Rob Ekern
President
C.R. Ekern & Company